Raju Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47378 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -269 Year- 2014 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Raju Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav Son of Yoganand Yadav@ Yoganand Ray Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, Baghail, P.S. Jadia,DistrictSupaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Forbesganj P. S. Case No. 269 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 379, 467, 468, 471 and 472 of the IPC. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that on forged signature the petitioner has taken an identify card and the voter card of the informant and he is using the same for illegal purpose. It is further alleged that the petitioner has already accused in five cases also.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has not committed any office and the entire allegation against the petitioner is false and concocted and charge has been framed against the petitioner and the petitioner has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47378 of 2018 (4) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 in custody since 31.03.2015.

Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbisganj P.S.Case No. 269 of 2014 ( G.R. No. 16-06/2014), subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T