Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44823/2024bail granted

Aalim Ansari @ Md. Aalim Ansari @ Alim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-23Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44823 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2024 Thana- KARAMCHAT District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Aalim Ansari @ Md. Aalim Ansari @ Alim Ansari S/o- Mainuddin Ansari @ Md. Mainuddin Ansari Village- Kudhari Kurari Ps- Karamchat Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Parwej Khan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024 dated 14.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 366 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The occurrence took place on 08.02.2024 but the F.I.R. was lodged on 14.02.2024 and there is no explanation for this delay. There was love affair between the victim and the petitioner. The victim in her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44823 of 2024(3) dt.23-07-2024 2/2 statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that she herself left the house due to quarrel with her mother on the issue of cooking meal and she was not kidnapped by the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is nothing on record which shows that the victim was forced to have illicit intercourse with another person. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T