Ranjan Yadav @ Ravi Kumar@ Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46896 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2016 Thana -ARWAL District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. RANJAN YADAV @ RAVI KUMAR@ RANJAN, Son of Vijay Yadav, Resident of Village- Utta Madarpur, P.S. + District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kunwar Digvijay Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Arwal P.S.Case no.60 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner, as per FIR, is of committing dacoity and the case is under Section 395 of the Indian Penal, later on name of the petitioner has transpired in this case during investigation on suspicion.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from his possession and though he is accused in eight other cases also but he is on bail in those cases. Further submission is that one co-accused whose case is similar to the petitioner has already been granted bail by this Court, vide

order dated 20.6.2017 passed in cr. Misc. No.19435 of 2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that CDR shows presence of the petitioner at the place of occurrence.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Arwal in connection with Arwal P.S.Case No.60 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidences.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court concerned and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T