← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12357/2019disposed

Nilam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-25Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12357 of 2019 ====================================================== Nilam Kumari W/o Pintu Kumar Yadav R/o Village Regani, P.O.- Naudiha Jhurang P.S. and Anchal Fatehpur District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

5.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Gaya.

7.

The Child Development Project Officer Fatehpur Block, Gaya. 8.

The Womens Supervisor Child Development Project Fatehpur, Gaya. 9.

Smt. Kumari Shyama Rani W/o Abhay Nandan Paswan R/o Village Regani P.O.- Naidaha Jhurang PS and Anchal- Fatehpur District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Pratap (GP2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-06-2019 Heard Mr. Rama Kant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dev Kumar Pandey, learned AC to GP2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the District Magistrate, Gaya has not disposed off the appeal preferred by her against the order passed by the District Programme Officer, Gaya in Anganbari Case No. 51 of 2018,

Patna High Court CWJC No.12357 of 2019(2) dt.25-06-2019 2/3 till date even when such memo of appeal was filed on 24.12.2018.

It appears from the record that the petitioner as well as the private-respondent no. 9 had applied for being considered to be appointed as Anganwari Sevika at Anganwari Centre, Regani in the district of Gaya. It is the claim of the petitioner that on wrong mapping register, the private-respondent no. 9 was recommended for being appointed and was appointed on such post. A complaint was lodged with necessary details by the petitioner before the District Programme Officer, Gaya, who, vide his order dated 26.11.2018 contained in memo no. 2370, rejected such complaint of the petitioner. As noted above, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the District Magistrate, Gaya on 24.12.2018 but till date, no decision has been taken on the aforesaid appeal. Under the aforesaid circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the District Magistrate, Gaya to dispose off the appeal preferred by the petitioner, after hearing the parties and other stake-holders, within a period

Patna High Court CWJC No.12357 of 2019(2) dt.25-06-2019 3/3 of eight weeks from the date of presentation of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid observation / direction, this petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) skm/- U