Mukesh Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34552 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2017 Thana -BHIMPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Mukesh Sahani, son of Nasib Sahani, R/o Village- Belaganj, P.S.- Bhimpur, District- Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Bhimpur P.S.Case No. 3 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354B of the Indian Penal Code and 8 of POCSO Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he tried to outrage the modesty of daughter of informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody for six months.
Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34552 of 2017 (2) dt.28-07-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances and also considering the period of custody, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Bhimpur P.S.Case No. 3 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U