Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51392 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2021 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Ranjan Kumar Son Of Tunu Das R/O Village- Kumardih, P.S- Makhdumpur Dist- Jehanabad 2.

Jyoti Kumar Son Of Tunu Das R/O Village- Kumardih, P.S- Makhdumpur Dist- Jehanabad 3.

Chandan Kumar Son Of Shyamdev Das R/O Village- Kumardih, P.SMakhdumpur Dist- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through the virtual court proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 353, 332, 333, 337, 224, 225, 307, 354, 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners and other co-accused persons are said to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51392 of 2021(2) dt.06-05-2022 2/2 have assaulted the police personnel with lathi, danda etc. resultantly, Home Guard Sepoy, Dularchand Prasad sustained injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2021. However, if the petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T