Sanjeev Ojha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46794 of 2015 Arising Out of Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. -37 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHAJITPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Sanjeev Ojha, Son of Surendra Prasad Ojha, resident of village - Kolhuwa, P.S.- Sahajitpur, District - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147m 148m 149m 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 of Indian Penal Code and 3(i)(x) of SC/ST Act. Considering the nature of allegation and the fair antecedents of the Petitioner, let the Petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2015, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46794 of 2015 (2) dt.02-11-2015 2/2 bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T