Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47132/2017bail granted

Shree Raman Prasad @ Raman Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-17Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47132 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47132 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -311 Year- 2017 Thana -LAHERIASARAI District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Shree Raman Prasad @ Raman Prasad Son of Late Bengali Sah, R/o Village- Navtoliya, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Satyendra Kumar Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2017 in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 311 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Section 380, 34, 411 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner being the owner of 'Shringar Vatika Jewelry' has been falsely implicated as the goods recovered from his shop do not answer to the description of the jewelry narrated in the FIR, which itself falsify the accusation as concerns the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 311 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47132 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T