← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18389/2012disposed

Swaraj Pd. Singh v. The Union Bank Of India And ORS

2016-09-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18389 of 2012 =========================================================== Swaraj Prasad Singh S/O- Late Kameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village + P.O.- Gandhsara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union Bank of India, Pagra Nawada Branch at Ghatnawadah, P.O.- Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur represented through its Branch Manager, the Union Bank of India, Pagra Nawada Branch at Ghatnawadah, P.O.- Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur

2. The Branch Manager, the Union Bank of India, Pagra Nawada Branch at Ghatnawadah, P.O.- Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sri Prakash Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.

For the Bank : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the legal notice dated 31.05.2012 (Annexure-5) by which the respondents have charged a sum of Rs. 2,17,025/- in the loan account of the petitioner; and for connected reliefs.

3. Without going into the detailed merits of the claims contained in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the petitioner has since liquidated the entire loan and the tractor has been released by the Bank in favour of the petitioner.

4. Having regard to the stand taken on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

5. An oral prayer is made on behalf of the petitioner for

Patna High Court CWJC No.18389 of 2012 dt.26-09-2016 2/2 compensation for delay in release of the tractor to the petitioner. This Court makes no observation in this behalf.

6. Needless to say, the petitioner is always at liberty to approach such appropriate forum as may be available to him in accordance with law for raising his claim for compensation. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 27.09.2016 Transmission Date N.A.