Patna High CourtCWJC/9122/2014disposed

Shiv Prasad Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-26Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9122 of 2014 ====================================================== Shiv Prasad Rai, S/o Shri Bhuali Rai, resident of village- Batrauli, P.O. Semari, P.S. Baniyapur, District - Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Saran at Chapra.

3. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

4. The District Supply Officer, Saran at Chapra.

5. The Sub - Divisional Officer, Sadar Chapra.

6. The Block Supply Officer, Baniyapur, District - Chapra. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Singh. AC to GP-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 26-03-2015 Counsel for the parties are present.

This matter has been listed under the heading 'To be mentioned' at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner who while praying for disposal of the writ petition makes a request for an appropriate direction to the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra who is in seisin of the matter arising from Supply Appeal No.3 of 2014 preferred by the petitioner, a licensee under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 being aggrieved by the order dated 20.12.2013 of the Licensing Authority -cum- Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Chapra. The petitioner bears Licence No.90 of 2007 for running a fair price shop.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9122 of 2014 (2) dt.26-03-2015 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the limited grievance raised by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra to consider and dispose of Supply Appeal No.3 of 2014 in accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U