Suresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46688 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-521 Year-2022 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Suresh Ram 2.
Daroga Ram 3.
Rajesh Ram 1 To 3 Son Of Lalan Ram 4.
Lalan Ram Son Of Late Ramnath Ram 5.
Manoj Ram Son Of Shankar Ram 6.
Awadhesh Ram 7.
Akhilesh Ram Both Sons Of Amar Ram 8.
Chhathu Ram 9.
Sanjay Ram Both Sons Of Shewan Ram 10.
Prabhunath Ram Son Of Ram Raj Ram 11.
Umesh Ram 12.
Biukash Ram Both Sons Of Prabhunath Ram 13.
Santosh Ram Son Of Lallu Ram 14.
Jiut Ram Son Of Ramawatar Ram All Are Residents Of Village- Chausa Bazar, P.S.- Buxar, (MUFFASIL, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46688 of 2024(2) dt.08-08-2024 2/3 Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 204, 506 and 34 of the IPC in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.521 of 2022.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and informant alleges that on 30.11.2022 he along with his family members and nephew were sitting at his door when Suresh, Daroga and Rajesh came variously armed in drunken state and caught the collar of the informant, on which the informant protested when Suresh assaulted him by butt of pistol causing injury on head, thereafter Daroga assaulted the wife of the brother of the informant by an iron rod on her stomach and Rajesh pulled her cloth while Santosh and Manoj assaulted the brother and nephew of the informant by Garasa.
4. The learned counsel submits that petitioners are neighbors of the informant and they are having dispute from before, on account of which the police even initiated prohibitory proceedings against the parties. It is next submitted that the entire family members have been implicated, but then from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that the same records that the doctor with respect to the injuries suffered by the injured has opined that the injuries are simple in nature, caused by hard and blunt object. It is thus submitted that it
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46688 of 2024(2) dt.08-08-2024 3/3 amply demonstrates that petitioners never had any intention for committing a serious occurrence. It is next submitted that it does not appear probable that the informant with such precision could have alleged that who assaulted whom and by what. It is further submitted petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation.
5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.521 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T