Laddu @ Md. Laddu @ Sartaz v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42306 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2020 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== LADDU @ MD. LADDU @ SARTAZ S/O YASHIN Resident of villageSekh Tola, Ward No.- 15, Hasanpur, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Raniganj P.S. Case No. 383/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 411 & 413/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner in association of other co-accused is said to have committed theft in the house of the informant while he was sleeping in the night.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42306 of 2022(2) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that in the case diary the witnesses have supported the prosecution case and one mobile was also recovered from his possession. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T