Arjun Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52876 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -289 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHEBGANJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Arjun Raj S/o Raj Mangal Ram, resident of Village- Lakhnauri, P.S. Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 289 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 26(1-B)A, 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1AAA), 26(2), 27(2), 35 of the Arms Act, Section 3⁄4 of Explosive Act, Sections 16, 17 and 18 of U.A.P. Act.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.03.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. 17889 of 2018. Petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2017. It is alleged in the written report that one loaded country made pistol has been recovered from possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52876 of 2018 (4) dt.02-11-2018 2/2 Report with regard to present stage of the case was called for which has been received. The Trial Court has mentioned in the report that the case is pending at the stage of hearing of cognizance awaiting sanction order. In such circumstances, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 289 of 2017, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner.

The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the trial. He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case. He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial. In the event of default of two consecutive dates without valid reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T