Patna High CourtCWJC/8978/2014disposed

Ram Briksh Mahton v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-25Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8978 of 2014 ====================================================== Ram Briksh Mahton son of late Bechan Mahto resident of village, P.S. and P.O. Chewara, Azad Tola, District - Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Collector, Sheikhpura

2. Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Sheikhpura

3. Dy. Collector, Land Reforms, Sheikhpura

4. Anchal Adhikari, Chewara, District - Sheikhpura

5. Baso Sao son of Birju Sao

6. Jagarnath Sao son of Baso Sao

7. Bishwanath Sao son of Baso Sao Resident of Chewara, P.S. Chewara, District - Sheikhpura

8. Sitaram Paswan son of late Prasadi Kewat

9. Budhan Kewat son of late Prasadi Kewat

10. Nunulal Kewat son of late Nirmali Kewat Resident of Chewara, P.S. Chewara, District - Sheikhpura

11. Kushum Kewat son of Nilkanth Sao, Kandu Resident of Chewara, P.S. Chewara, District - Sheikhpura .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sushil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 25-10-2016 Heard both sides.

The writ application prays for a direction upon the respondent(s) to implement the order dated 27.08.2012 passed by the respondent-Dy. Collector Land Reforms in Land Dispute Resolution Case No. 79/11-12.

Raising a grievance with respect to a piece of land, the petitioner had approached the respondent-DCLR wherein the said order was passed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8978 of 2014 (2) dt.25-10-2016 2/2 Learned counsel for the State on the basis of Annexure-3 to the writ petition has submitted that the Circle Officer is already in seisin of the matter, wherein hearing has been given to both the parties.

This Court would not be the executing Court of the order(s) passed by the Authority under the Land Dispute Resolution Act (for short "The Act"). Section 15 of the Act vests the power in DCLR to execute the order passed by him. The petitioner may approach the said court/authority for implementation of the order in accordance with the provisions contained therein.

If any such application/request is filed/made, the concerned authority will examine and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

The writ application is disposed of.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) rohit/- U