Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40964/2017rejected

Sikandar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40964 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -199 Year- 2014 Thana -GAURICHAK District- PATNA ====================================================== Sikandar Kumar, Son of Late Shivendra Prasad, Resident of VillageParwalpur, P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Bansh Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier twice rejected by orders dated 12.02.2016 and 14.12.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 3565 of 2016 and 53411 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 14.08.2014, the trial has not been concluded within the stipulated period and up till now only one prosecution witness has been examined.

The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail of the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner has been identified in the test identification parade by the informant and the informant has stated that the petitioner administered injection causing him

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40964 of 2017 (2) dt.30-08-2017 2/2 senseless and fled away with the loaded truck. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with S.T. No. 121 of 2017 arising out of GauriChak P.S. Case No. 199 of 2014 pending in the court of Additional District Judge, Patna City, Patna.

However, considering the period of detention, the learned trial Judge is directed to conclude Sessions Trial No. 121 of 2017 arising out of GauriChak P.S. Case No. 199 of 2014 as early as possible preferably within two months, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T