Kishori Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41794 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2024 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Kishori Prasad Singh S/o- Khattar Singh Village- Sukki Nasi Tola PsKhajauli Dist- Madhubani 2.

Chandrakala Devi @ Kalawati Devi W/o- Kishori Prasad Singh VillageSukki Nasi Tola Ps- Khajauli Dist- Madhubani 3.

Hiralal Singh @ Hira Prasad Singh S/o- Radhe Shyam Singh VillageSingrahi Ps- Jaynagar Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Abhigyan Kumar, Mr. Amit Narayan, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 354, 498(A), 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. It is alleged that these petitioners along with other F.I.R. named accused persons tortured and harassed the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41794 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 and petitioner no. 3 is maternal father-in-law of the informant. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and they are not concerned with family affairs of the couple. Petitioners are merely victims of over implications. Moreover, thrust of accusation is against husband of the informant. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

6. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Khajauli P. S. Case No. 114 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T