← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43361/2022bail granted

Mukesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-30Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43361 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2022 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Mukesh Mahto, S/O Pulkit Mahto R/O Village- Purnahi, P.S.- Warisnagar, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore (APP.100) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 2561.560 litres of liquor from a truck. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is next submitted that petitioner is neither the owner, nor the driver of the alleged truck. It is also submitted that he came to be implicated at the instance of the S.H.O. of Warisnagar Police Station. The learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43361 of 2022(2) dt.30-08-2022 2/2 counsel next submits that petitioner was implicated only with a view to save the real culprit.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Warisnagar P. S. Case No.09 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T