Mithilesh Singh @ Mithilesh Kumar Singh @ Mithilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46931 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -228 Year- 2015 Thana -NOKHA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Mithilesh Singh @ Mithilesh Kumar Singh @ Mithilesh Kumar, S/o Shri Kashi Singh, R/o Village- Dharupur, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nokha P.S.Case No.228 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504, 506, 341 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is of firing on the son of the informant, causing injury. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegation will falsify from the statement of the injured during the course of investigation, which will appear from para 38 of the case diary, as he has stated that the other co-accused persons has fired on him. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 7.8.2017.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46931 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Nokha P.S.Case No.228 of 2015. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidences.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court concerned and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T