Ratnesh Giri And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47651 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2014 Thana -DUMRIAGHAT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ratnesh Giri son of Ganesh Giri

2. Rabindra Giri son of Chandrika Giri

3. Pappu Giri son of Chandrika Giri

4. Shyamakant Giri son of Jagat Giri All are residents of Village - Rampur Khajuria, P.S. Dumariya Ghat, District - East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-01-2016 Heard Sri Mrityunjay Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners , learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel who has appeared on behalf of the informant.

Four petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Dumariya Ghat P.S. Case No. 120 of 2014 registered for the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 447, 452, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there was case and counter case in between the parties. He submits that in the counter case which was filed from the side of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47651 of 2015 (3) dt.29-01-2016 2/2 the petitioners accused persons have been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail and as such he makes a prayer for granting the same relief to the petitioners of the present case. In view of the nature of accusation as disclosed in the F.I.R., I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. However, if the petitioners appear before the court below and make a prayer for regular bail within a period of six weeks from today, the learned court below without being prejudiced with this order may examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferably on the same day. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T