Urpramila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2259 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8348 of 2012 ====================================================== Urpramila Devi wife of Late Nand Lal Singh resident of Village- Kuriya, P.O. and P.S. Pipra Kothi, District- East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Jitendra Srivastava, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Secretary, Public Health and Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

Sri S.C. Mishra, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Engineer-in- Chief-cum- Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

Sri Arun Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Dhaka, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Abhinav Shandaliya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (AAG-5) Mr. Vishwambhar Pd. AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2023 Heard the parties.

This application has been preferred for compliance of order dated 28.06.2012 passed in CWJC No. 8348 of 2012. A show cause on behalf of the opposite party nos. 1 to 4 is on record annexing the memo no. 1063 dated 18.11.2022 passed by the Joint Secretary by which the claim of the petitioner has been accepted and they have been regularized

Patna High Court MJC No.2259 of 2019(5) dt.01-08-2023 2/2 with effect from 01.12.2006 with all consequential benefits. In that view of the matter, no contempt is made out, if the petitioner still has any grievance, can always agitate the same.

The MJC No. 2259 of 2019 stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) kiran/- U