Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52432 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-514 Year-2020 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR SON OF LALLU YADAV @ LAL BABU RAY R/O VILLAGE- KADHAN, P.S.- KESHARIYA, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-11-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner alongwith the accused persons on the point of pistol stopped the motorcycle of the informant and snatched the key of the motorcycle and took out cash, Adhar Card, Driving License from the pocket of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52432 of 2021(3) dt.07-11-2022 2/2 leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. During investigation the petitioner was made accused in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the petitioner is also involved in the present case and this fact is also supported in the case diary.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of offence and materials available in the case diary, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner named above on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected.

This instant application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T