← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2958/2015disposed

Sarfraj Khan v. The Bank Of India Through Its Zonal Manager Namely Mr. P.K.Mishra And ORS

2016-10-05Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2958 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11964 of 2015 ====================================================== Sarfraj Khan S/o late Ekbal Ahmad Khan Resident of village & Post - Chorma, P.S. Chorma, Distt. East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Bank of India through its Zonal Manager Namely Mr. P.K.Mishra son of not known to Petitioner , Zonal Office, Muzaffarpur Zone, Pankaj Market , Saraiyaganj, Muzaffarpur.

2. Mr. P.K. Mishra Son of not known to the Petitioner the Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Pankaj Market, Muzaffarpur.

3. Mr. D.P. Singh son of not known to Petitioner, Dy. Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Zonal office, Pankaj Market , Muzaffarpur.

4. Mr. N. Mishra Son of not known to petitioner the Branch Manager, Bank of India, Chorma Branch, East Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

05-10-2016 On call, none appeared on behalf of petitioner either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. On last date, the case was adjourned on the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Ajay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party/Bank of India submits that show cause has already been prepared and due to non-availability of learned counsel for the petitioner, it could not be served. Sri Sinha intends to file show cause. He may file it in Registry. It is made clear that the Registry will accept the show cause of Sri Sinha in this case,

Patna High Court MJC No.2958 of 2015 (3) dt.05-10-2016 2/2 even in absence of service report of same on the petitioner. Sri Sinha submits that in compliance with the order of the writ court, the Bank has already vacated the premises of the petitioner and paid all the arrear rent.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U