Md. Mustkim @ Md. Mustkin v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28255 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -709 Year- 2009 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Md. Mustkim @ Md. Mustkin, S/o Md. Rahmuddin Miyan, resident of village- Sirsia Hanumanganj Tola, Bariyahi, P.S.- Bhargama, DistrictAraria .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tapeshwar Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner being the husband of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which processes have been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The basic accusation is of torture for nonfulfillment of the dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the complaint was filed in 2009, but order of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28255 of 2016 (2) dt.11-07-2016 cognizance has been passed on 29.06.2015. Statement to that effect has been made in para-5 of the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner admits the marriage with the complainant and he is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Statement to that effect has been made in para- 8 of the petition which reads as follows:- "That the petitioner is husband of complainant and he is ready to keep his wife with all the respect and love." Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No. 709C of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant on her appearance the petitioner will take the complainant to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed within six months by the learned court below in three eventualities:- (i) on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony; (ii) or if the complainant gets
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28255 of 2016 (2) dt.11-07-2016 reluctant to reconcile the issue; and (iii) or if the complainant fails to appear before the learned court.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T