Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46210/2017bail granted

Rana Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46210 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46210 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -171 Year- 2017 Thana -KIUL RAIL P.S. District- LAKHISARAI ======================================================

1. Rana Yadav son of Nepali Yadav

2. Sunil Kumar Son of Jaynath Yadav Both residents of village Husenpur Khudiban, P.S. Dharahra District Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Raju For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Kiul Rail P.S.Case No.171 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioners is about recovery of 45 kg. of Mahua Flower.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody since 10.8.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46210 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. District and Sessions JudgeIInd-cum-Special Judge Excise, Lakhisarai in connection with Kiul Rail P.S.Case No.171 of 2017 dated 9.8.2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T