Manjoor Mian @ Manjur Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52233 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2021 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Manjoor Mian @ Manjur Ansari, Son Of Kashim Mian @ Kasim Miyan Resident Of Village - Bariyarpur, Bintoli, P.S- Nautan Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, is a young boy of 21 years of age and the informant alleges that the petitioner is trying to commit theft of Lichi from his tree, when objected, the petitioner stabbed him causing injury on his jaw and the back. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated and even presuming what is alleged is true without admitting for the purposes of anticipatory bail, then this is the first offence of the petitioner and the petitioner is a young boy and if the petitioner will go to jail, he may fall in company of hardened criminal.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52233 of 2021(2) dt.20-06-2022 2/2 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that no doubt, it is the first offence of the petitioner and petitioner is young boy, but then he ought not to have assaulted the informant in the manner as it has been alleged.

The Court in the nature of allegation does not feel persuaded to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Though, the case prima facie appears to be a fit case for regular bail. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with a liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of two weeks from today and in the event, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of two weeks from today, then if possible, the learned Court below shall dispose of the case of the petitioner on the same day when he surrenders.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T