← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51894/2021bail rejected

Angad Yadav @ Angad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-08Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51894 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2020 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Angad Yadav @ Angad Kumar Son Of Siken Yadav @ Sikandar Prasad Yadav Resident Of Village - Thatha, P.S.- Mansi, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-A), 26, 27 of the Arms Act.

It is a case of commission of murder of the husband of the informant by opening fire by the petitioner and other accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the background of some political rivalry, the present F.I.R has been registered. There is counter version of the occurrence also and the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51894 of 2021(7) dt.08-09-2022 2/3 registered by the petitioner's side is at earlier point of time.

In contra, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. There is specific accusation of opening fire to the deceased against the petitioner due to which he succumbed to the injuries. The postmortem report as well as the statement of the witnesses corroborate the prosecution case.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner stands rejected.

The petitioner is directed to surrender before learned Court below and pray for regular bail. The learned Court below may consider the prayer for regular

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51894 of 2021(7) dt.08-09-2022 3/3 bail of the petitioner, keeping in view the facts stated above, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T