Dablu Singh And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50729 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -2225 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Dablu Singh, Son of Late Ram Pravesh Singh, resident of VillageSuitha, P.S. - Parsa Bazar, District- Patna.

2. Binay Singh @ Lambu @ Binay Singh @ Limbyand, son of Late Sulendra Singh, resident of Village- Suitha, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, DistrictPatna.

3. Ranjan Singh, son of Late Brahmdeo Singh, resident of Village- Palanga, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Subash Singh, Son of Sri Laldeo Singh, R/o Village- Palanga, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, complainant and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2225/2013 for the offences instituted under Sections 323, 379 and 504 of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the complainant has land dispute with some other persons. Petitioners have got no claim over the land of the complainant. The allegation is that the petitioners variously armed came and threatened the complainant

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50729 of 2015 (3) dt.09-02-2016 2/2 to destroy the mango plants from the field of the complainant. Vide Annexure-1, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners was refused by this Court but liberty was given to the petitioners to seek regular bail where their prayer for regular bail shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit, in accordance with prevailing law.

Taking into account the observations and the directions made by this Court, I do not find any reason to interfere. The petitioner is still at liberty to surrender before the court below and seek their regular bail in light of the observations made in Cr. Misc. No. 23116/2014 dated 15.10.2014.

With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T