Patna High CourtCWJC/16832/2015disposed

Manoranjan Pd. Sinha And ORS v. District Selection Committee Through Its Chairman Cum District Magistrate, Jamui And ORS

2018-07-16Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 16832 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Manoranjan Pd Sinha son of Sri Mohan Prasad resident of Village- Dharampur, P.S.- Khaira, Dist- Jamui.

2. Ashok Kumar S/o Late Gokhul Yadav resident of Village- Kalyanpur, P.S. Jamui, Dist- Jamui.

3. Sonu Kumar Yadav S/o Sri Naresh Gope, resident of Village- Bihari, Ward No.6, P.S. & Dist- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. District Selection Committee through its Chairman cum District Magistrate, Jamui

2. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger.

4. District Magistrate cum Chairman, District Selection Committee, Jamui.

5. Deputy Development Commissioner, Jamui.

6. Nazarat Deputy Collector-cum-Member Secretary, District Selection Committee, Jamui.

7. Block Development Officer, Lakshmipur, Jamui. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr S K Ranjan, AC to GP XVII =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent-State.

2 Petitioners' counsel submits that though the petitioners have been empanelled for appointment by way of regularization in the year, 2013 for Group D employees, they have not been appointed till date.

3 Since consideration has to be made by the District

Patna High Court CWJC No.16832 of 2015 dt.16-07-2018 2/2 Magistrate -cum- Chairman, District Selection Committee, Jamui (respondent No 4), no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

4 The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to respondent No 4 to consider the petitioners' case for regularization and dispose of the claim of the petitioners by reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 01.08.2018 Transmission Date NA