← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51930/2021bail rejected

Md. Zafeer v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-04Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51930 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2021 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR RAIL P.S. DistrictSaran ====================================================== 1.

Md. Zafeer, Son of Md. Satto Resident of Village - Ballipur, Pavsauna, P.S. - Hathauri, District - Samastipur.

2.

Md. Zakir, son of Md. Hakeem Resident of Village - Shahee Bhalura, P.S. - Auraee, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Bipin Chandra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-04-2022 Heard counsel for the parties.

The petitioners are accused in connection with Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No.47 of 2021 (G.R. No.68 of 2021) under Sections 370/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 75/79 Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and under Section 14 of Child & Adolescent, Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, 1985.

Allegation against the petitioners is that informant Anil Kumar, Railway Child Line Co-ordinator on 12.05.2021 along with his associates was standing at Platform No.3. 05162 Manduadih (Vanaras) Train arrived and he saw 6-7 minor children moving along with these petitioners. Upon query, the children failed to give satisfactory reply and or could not say

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51930 of 2021(3) dt.04-04-2022 2/2 their names and addresses. Upon confronting these petitioners, it was revealed that they were taking the minor children to Jaipur for child trafficking.

Considering the gravity of the allegations that has been made against the accused persons in the FIR, I am not inclined to grant these petitioners the privilege of bail, which is accordingly rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T