← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51092/2024allowed

Manna Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-04Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51092 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2024 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Manna Yadav SON OF LATE LABBU YADAV VILLAGE- GANGAPUR, PS- CHAKAND, DIST- GAYA 2.

BAIJU YADAV SON OF MUNNA YADAV VILLAGE- GANGAPUR, PSCHAKAND, DIST- GAYA 3.

MOHIT KUMAR SON OF DHARMENDRA YADAV VILLAGEGANGAPUR, PS- CHAKAND, DIST- GAYA 4.

ROHIT KUMAR SON OF DHARMENDRA YADAV VILLAGEGANGAPUR, PS- CHAKAND, DIST- GAYA ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegations against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused is said to have assaulted the informant due to which he sustained injury in his eye.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51092 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/2 omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Both sides have filed cases against each other. The injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that there is land dispute between the parties and the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No.16 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T