Raj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42779 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2006 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RAJ KUMAR YADAV S/O BALESHWAR YADAV Resident of villageGauchiya, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No.77 of 2006, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of killing the son of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner has got two criminal antecedents as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The specific allegation is against co-accused, Upadhyay Yadav and Vimal Yadav.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42779 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the occurrence took place in the year 2006 and the petitioner has filed the present anticipatory bail application after more than 15 years.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T