Hare Ram Kumar @ Hareram Sah @ Hareram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42248 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Hare Ram Kumar @ Hareram Sah @ Hareram S/o- Dhup Nath Sah Resident of Village- Isaruli Patedhi, P/S- Marhowrah, Districrt- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Pankaj Yadav S/o Chandrama Yadav R/o Village- Channa, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Marhaura, Distt.- Saran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 11 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 137(2), 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Accusation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the informant's minor daughter for the purpose of marriage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner and the victim have love affair and both eloped from their house for their marriage. Learned counsel further submitted that as per the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42248 of 2025(6) dt.03-11-2025 2/2 medical report of the victim, there is no recent sign of sexual intercourse. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has supported the case of the prosecution.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T