Sunil Kumar Mahto v. Tetri Devi And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Appeal No.375 of 2008 =========================================================== Sunil Kumar Mahto, son of Tribeni Mahto, Resident of Village- Singhiya, P.S. Singhiya, District- Samastipur .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

Tetri Devi, wife of Late Sukhdeo Mahto alias Sukhdeo Pasi, Resident of VillageHarsinghpur Dath, P.S. bahera, District- Darbhanga, At present Village- Jayantipur (Mushari Chowk, P.S. Bahera, District- Darbhanga) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Das, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ajit Ranjan Jha, Advocate For Insurance Company : Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-07-2017 This is an appeal by the owner of the vehicle challenging an interlocutory order passed in a proceeding under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act by which as the Insurance Company was not impleaded as a party, the interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been awarded against the owner.

Keeping in view the fact that the appeal is against an interim Award, the same is dismissed, as the appellant owner can

Patna High Court MA No.375 of 2008 dt.06-07-2017 2/2 always raise the issue after the final Award is passed. Accordingly, finding no ground to interfere at this interlocutory stage, the appeal is dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 11.07.2017 Transmission Date