← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29089/2015bail granted

Nagendra Thakur @ Nageshwar Thakur And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-05Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29089 of 2015 (3) dt.05-10-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29089 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2015 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Nagendra Thakur @ Nageshwar Thakur S/o Late Rup Kant Thakur

2. Shakuntala Devi W/o Nagendra Thakur @ nageshwar Thakur Both are Resident of Village Nainha (Milki), P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners being the father-in-law and mother-inlaw are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 326, 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that save and except, the bald allegation leveled against the petitioners, there is no other cogent material in the case diary to implicate the petitioners in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioners are old persons and co-villagers have stated that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29089 of 2015 (3) dt.05-10-2015 petitioners have no role to play in the aforesaid offence. Leaned counsel for the State after perusal of the case diary submits that co-villages/neighbors have also affirmed the story that the petitioners had never demanded dowry. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case also the fact that petitioners have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C..

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T