Mangal Prasad @ Mangal Rawani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54577 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -181 Year- 2018 Thana -SULTANGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== Mangal Prasad @ Mangal Rawani S/o Late Ram Lakhan Prasad @ Late Ram Lakhan Rawani, R/v - Tikiyatoli, Chaitola, Mahavir Sthan, P.S.- Sultanganj, Distt.- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 181/2018 corresponding to Special Case No. 65/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b), 17 and 11 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Allegation is recovery of 3 K.g. 600 gms. of Ganja from the house of petitioner.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Co-accused Ram Pravesh Prasad has been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 08.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59073/2018. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 05.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54577 of 2018 (4) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Patna in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 181/2018 corresponding to Special Case No. 65/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T