Raj Nandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Inspector General Of Police,Patna And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.288 of 2014 ========================================================== Raj Nandan Singh, son of Late Fekan Singh, resident of Village-Dariapur, P.S.- Sahapur, Danapur, District-Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Inspector General of Police, Patna.

2. Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

3. Sub-divisional Police Officer, Danapur, Patna.

4. Officer-in-charge, Sahapur Police Station, Danapur, Patna. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. R.R. K. Pandey, SC-27 Mr. Kriya Nand Jha, AC to SC-29 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The instant application has been filed by the petitioner for appropriate direction to the investigating officer of the Shahpur P.S. Case No. 76 of 2010 dated 19th July, 2010 to conclude the case by submitting charge sheet against the accused persons named in the FIR.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.288 of 2014 dt.10-02-2015 2 / 2 petitioner is informant of the aforesaid case registered under Sections 468, 469, 471, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. According to him, the police are not investigated the case properly and no action has been taken against the persons named in the FIR. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has submitted that in course of investigation and supervision of the case, the police have not found the accusation to be true against the FIR named accused, namely, Sudhir Kumar Singh, Deepak Kumar, Upendra Singh and Munna Singh. So far as the other accused persons are concerned, the police have already submitted charge sheet against them.

In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the State, I find no merit in the present application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T