Anil Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44937 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2014 Thana -RAJPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Umesh Rai @ Umesh Kumar Rai son of Raghunath Rai, resident of village- Ranipatti, Police Station- Rajepur, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.49664 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2014 Thana -RAJPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar

2. Sunil kumar both sons of Devki nandan resident of village- Shobhita, Police Station- Rajepur ,District East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.44937 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.Dayal(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.49664 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 420,467,468

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44937 of 2015 (3) dt.03-11-2015 2/3 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that the informant being a mobile phone and SIM Card dealer, came to know that two mobile SIM cards were purchased in name of Rajkumar, son of Arvind Kumar and Gopi Singh. The informant subsequently came to know through newspaper that extortion has been demanded from one of the mobile numbers sold by him being SIM number 8651899427 from the business men of Rajepur and Tetaria. On enquiry, it was found that Raushan Kumar son of Amar Deo Rai was using the aforesaid number by committing forgery leading to registration of FIR against Raushan Kumar. During investigation, the name of the petitioner sprang up.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even assuming the accusation no offence is made out against the petitioners as the accusation is specific against Raushan Kumar and maliciously the police has roped the petitioners in four other cases initially registered against unknown between July and August, 2014.

The aforesaid facts constitute ground for consideration of the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners by the learned court below in case the petitioners surrender within six weeks from today in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 131 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44937 of 2015 (3) dt.03-11-2015 3/3 2014 pending in the court of learned SDJM, Sikarhana, East Champaran, Motihari.

This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation/direction.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anil/- U T