Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45711/2017bail granted

Nagendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45711 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45711 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2017 Thana -BUDDHACOLONY District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Nagendra Kumar Son of Jai Dayal Rai, R/o Village- Rambag, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna at present in the house of Ajit Rajan Singh @ Dblu Yadav, Bansghat, North to Bandh, Gai Khatal, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Buddha Colony P.S.Case No.212 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273,30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 12 bottle of 750 ml. each liquor.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 1.7.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45711 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Patna in connection with Buddha Colony P.S.Case No.212 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T