Smt. Sunita Devi @ Smt. Sunita Rai v. The State Of Bihar, Through Director General Of Police-Cum-Inspector General Of Police, Bihar Old S

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.34 of 2014 ====================================================== Smt. Sunita Devi @ Smt. Sunita Rai, Wife of Sri Dhananjay Rai @ Guddu Rai, R/o Village-Dihri, P.S.- Rajpur, Distt -Buxar, at present sitting Pramukh of Chausa Block (twice elected uncontested) in the district of Buxar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Director General of Police-cum-Inspector General of Police, Bihar Old Secretariat Building

2. The Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone, North Gandhi Maidan, Patna

3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Shahabad Range, Dehri on Sone, Distt-Rohtas at Sasaram.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Buxar

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Buxar

6. The Officer in Charge, Rajpur Police Station, Distt- Buxar

7. The District Magistrate, Buxar

8. Vineet Kumar Rai, Son of Late Daya Shankar Rai R/o Village-Dihri, P.S. Rajpur, Distt- Buxar (the informant of Rajpur P. S. Case No 205/13 dated 27.10.2013)

9. Ram Dayal Rai, Son of Late Vindhyachal Rai R/o Dehri, P.S. Rajpur, Distt-Buxar (the informant of Rajpur P. S. Case No 223/13 dated 23.11.2013) .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Uma Shankar, GP-4 Mr. Karandeep Kumar, AC to GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 09-01-2015 The petitioner has been made named accused in

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.34 of 2014 (2) dt.09-01-2015 2 / 2 Rajpur P.S. Case No. 205 of 2013 dated 27.10.2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Rajpur P.S. Case No. 223 of 2013 dated 23.11.2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By filing the present application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of both the aforesaid FIRs being Rajpur P.S. Case No. 205 and 223 of 2013.

The allegations made in the aforesaid two FIRs do constitute cognizable offence.

In that view of the matter, I find no merit in the present application. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T