Abdul Kayum v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52467 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2021 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Abdul Kayum, Son Of Md. Abdul Latif Resident Of Village- Damodarpur, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Priyesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.II Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State are present. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the informant.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 379, 506, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Md. Amjad and Md. Sonu caught the informant and Md. Shahid assaulted by bhujali on head of Sikandar Ali, the brother of the informant, but he managed to save himself, but got hit on his hand and thus, was injured. It is further alleged that Md. Jubair and Md. Shahid assaulted the wife of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52467 of 2021(2) dt.21-06-2022 2/3 informant and there is allegation of snatching a gold chain from the neck of the wife of the informant.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present occurrence took place on account of land dispute between the parties, though the informant in the F.I.R. has concealed this fact. It is next submitted that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted Sikandar Ali on his hand causing injury. It is next submitted that it has been specifically stated at Para-13 of the anticipatory bail application that the injury on the injured were simple in nature.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the injury received by Sikandar Ali as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is simple in nature, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Kanti P. S. Case No.190

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52467 of 2021(2) dt.21-06-2022 3/3 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T