Tauhid Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45341 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2026 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Tauhid Alam S/o Moharam Mian R/o Village - Kalyanpur, Tola - Alaula, P.S - Kalyanpur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 76, 351(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the allegation, the son of the informant was assaulted by the petitioner by means of lathi upon head causing head injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner and the informant are agnates and there was family dispute between the parties. It has further been submitted that due to mistake, the son of the informant received head injuries by means of lathi. It has further been submitted that good sense has prevailed between the parties. It has further been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45341 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/2 submitted that the matter arose out of family dispute between the agnates and the parties have settled their dispute. It has further been submitted that there is no repetition of blow against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case and there is no allegation of tampering against the petitioner. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 01.04.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Heard the parties and perused the records.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Praveen Kumar, J) Aman/- U T