Qamar Khan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46845 of 2017 (3) dt.11-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46845 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2014 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Qamar Khan, Son of Late Jafaruddin Khan, Resident of VillageRatanpura, P.S.- Sherghati, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madhuranand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 116 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 387, 429, 435, 427, 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other accused person is of demand of extortion money from the informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that earlier in this case petitioner was granted the privilege of anticipatory bail, order of which is contained at Annexure -3, however, he could not surrender within the time prescribed in the said order, as such, he has been taken into custody and now has been in judicial custody since 10.07.2017. Further he is accused in one more case but he is on bail in that case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46845 of 2017 (3) dt.11-10-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 116 of 2014, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T