Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56312/2018bail granted

Sanni Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-26Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56312 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2018 Thana- MITHANPURA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sanni Kumar S/o Vijay Singh, R/o Romapark, B-15, P.S.- Badri (Samaypur), District- Delhi-42.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. Petitioner seeks bail in Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 231 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 328, 307, 419, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of making the Informant and his family members unconscious by serving cold drink in collusion with Daughter-in-law of the Informant which seemed to be dangerous to life.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56312 of 2018(4) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-East, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 231 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U