Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43813/2017bail granted

Mangal Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43813 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43813 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2017 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Mangal Paswan, Son of Ganga Paswan,

2. Pappu Paswan Son of Late Kodo Paswan, Both R/o Village- Paira Matihana, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)(c)(d) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 60 kg of mahua.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered either from their house or from their possession. Further they have no criminal antecedent and have been in judicial custody since 26.07.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43813 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Jamui, in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T