Brind Kumar Singh v. Bihar State Electricity Board

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11270 of 2022 ====================================================== Brind Kumar Singh S/o Late Ganga Deyal Singh, R/O Village and P.O. and P.S.- Koran Sarai, Dist.- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Bihar State Electricity Board through its Chairman. 2.

The General Manager (Revenue), South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited.

3.

Chief Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Buxar. 4.

Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Sub Division, Buxar. 5.

Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Koransarai, Buxar.

6.

Junior Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Section, Chougai, Buxar. 7.

Collector Buxar cum 2nd Appellate Authority, District Public Grievances Redressal Officer, Buxar.

8.

Additional Collector Buxar Cum Ist Appellate Authority, District Public Grievances Redressal Officer, Buxar.

9.

Sub Divisional, Public Grievances Redressal Officer, Dumraon, Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rameshwar Singh, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar (SC 9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a leave to approach the competent authority i.e. Respondent No. 2 herein by way of representation seeking reduction of the estimation given by the authorities.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.11270 of 2022(8) dt.18-08-2025 2/2 Respondent-South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited states that he has no objection if direction may be given to the Respondent No. 2 to consider the representation made by the petitioner in accordance with law.

3. Having regard to the above made submissions, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to make a suitable representation to the second respondent ventilating his grievance within a period of four weeks from today. On such representation being given, the Respondent No. 2 shall consider the same sympathetically duly taking into consideration the age of the petitioner and also his financial capacity. The authority while taking a decision shall not be influenced by the earlier orders passed by the first and the second appellate authority. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of representation by the petitioner.

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J) shakir/- U