← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39380/2019bail rejected

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-14Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39380 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2014 Thana- PAUTHU District- Aurangabad ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR S/o Awadhesh Singh Resident of Village- Pauthu Tola Pokhar Bigha, P.S.- Pauthu, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Pauthu P.S. Case No. 36/2014, instituted for offences under Section(s) 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3⁄4 of DP Act. Earlier prayer for bail of petitioner was rejected on merit by this Court vide order dated 29.11.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59386/2018.

Petitioner is husband of deceased.

It is alleged in the written report that daughter of informant was married with this petitioner one year ago. Just after marriage, she was tortured in her Sasural for demand of dowry. It is alleged that on 19.06.2014 informant got information that her daughter had fallen ill. Thereafter informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39380 of 2019(5) dt.14-08-2019 2/2 along with other family members went to Sasural of her daughter, where step-mother of petitioner disclosed that her daughter has been murdered and her dead body has been disposed off and accused persons have fled away. Report from the court below regarding stage of trial has been received wherein it is mentioned that charge has already been framed in this case.

This Court does not find any fresh ground to grant bail to the petitioner.

Therefore, prayer for bail of petitioner is again rejected.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T