Ravindra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41814 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Ravindra Prasad, aged-56 years, S/o Chamari Mahto Resident of VillagePatel Nagar (Nawada), P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner and other coaccused person is to have assaulted the informant and her family members and it is alleged that petitioner has also shot fire upon the informant with gun.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation of firing upon the informant is totally false and fabricated, infact, in order to pacify the matter, the petitioner brought his licency rifle from his house and made a single firing in the air with the sole intention to disperse the crowd from the place of occurrence as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41814 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 stated in para-8 of the bail petition. He further submits that there is case and counter-case between the parties. He next submits that there is no firearm injury sustained by informant or any other person. He next submits that co-accused person, namely, Chando Prasad @ Chandeshwar Prasad has been granted bail by the learned Trial Court. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering all facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also the fact that petitioner has got clean antecedent and there is not any firearm injury sustained by informant and her family members, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No.419 of 2025.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T