Maulavi Shamasar @ Maulvi Shamasar @ Md. Shamsar @ Mo. Somshad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47257 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2021 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Maulavi Shamasar @ Maulvi Shamasar @ Md. Shamsar @ Mo. Somshad SON OF MD. FARMAN VILLAGE- BATHUABUJURG, PSMUSRIGHARARI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 2.

RUBI KHATUN @ RUBEE KHATOON WIFE OF MAULVI SHAMSAR @ MD. SHAMSHAD @ MD. SHAMSAR VILLAGE- BATHUABUJURG, PS- MUSRIGHARARI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 3.

MD. KAIYUM SON OF MD. ABDUL VILLAGE- BARAIPURA BHAGWATPUR, WARD NO. 10, PS- SARAIRANJAN, DISTSAMASTIPUR 4.

MD. SHAMIM @ SAHIM @ MD. RAHIM SON OF MD. ABDUL VILLAGE- BARAIPURA BHAGWATPUR, WARD NO. 10, PSSARAIRANJAN, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 5.

SAHANA KHATUN DAUGHTER OF KETWALI MIYAN VILLAGEBARAIPURA BHAGWATPUR, WARD NO. 10, PS- SARAIRANJAN, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 6.

KHURSHIDA KHATOON @ KURSIDA KHATUN WIFE OF MD. KAIYUM VILLAGE- BARAIPURA BHAGWATPUR, WARD NO. 10, PSSARAIRANJAN, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 7.

NURJAHAN @ NOORJAHAN KHATOON WIFE OF MD. ABDUL VILLAGE- BARAIPURA BHAGWATPUR, WARD NO. 10, PSSARAIRANJAN, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 8.

MD. ABDUL SON OF KETWALI MIYAN VILLAGE- BARAIPURA BHAGWATPUR, WARD NO. 10, PS- SARAIRANJAN, DISTSAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

AFSANA KHATUN WIFE OF MD. SHAMIM @ MOHAMAD SAHIM VILLAGE- BARAIPURA BHAGWATPUR, WARD NO. 10, PSSARAIRANJAN, DIST- SAMASTIPUR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surya Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Jainandra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 Parties to the proceedings along with their counsel are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47257 of 2024(7) dt.01-05-2025 2/2 present. However, a submission has been made by learned counsel for the petitioners at this stage that petitioners have been granted the benefit of Section 35 of the B.N.S.S., hence he does not want to pursue the present application.

2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T