Urmila Kumari v. Sarju Ram And ANR

Patna High Court SA No.319 of 2004 (11) dt.21-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Second Appeal No.319 of 2004 ====================================================== Urmila Kumari .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

Sarju Ram & Anr .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh Mr. Kumar Madhurendra Mr. Ratan Kumar Sinha Mr. Md.Ataul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 21-02-2017 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant even after repeated calls.

Perused the office note, from which it transpires that this appeal has stood dismissed for default as against respondent No. 2. It appears from the memo of appeal that the plaintiff in the suit is the appellant in this appeal and the respondent No. 2 was defendant in the suit. As nobody has appeared before this Court on behalf of the appellant to show that this appeal can proceed in absence of respondent No. 2 on record, proceeding further with this appeal may result in inconsistent orders or conflicting decrees. As such, this appeal is dismissed as incompetent. Snkumar/- (V. Nath, J.) U