Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48626/2024bail granted

Md. Tausif v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-18Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48626 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2021 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== MD. TAUSIF SON OF AHMAD ALI ANSARI @ MD. MOSIM RESIDENT OF MOHALLA - NAKA CHOWK PURNIA CITY, POLICE STATION - SADAR, DISTRICT - PURNIA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 18-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.217 of 2024, arising out of Purnea Sadar P.S Case no. 340 of 2021 registered under sections 302, 306 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that his brother who was living in his 'sasural' was physically tortured and done to death. As a result of the pressure of the members of the family he used to communicate to the informant that he would commit suicide. Ultimately the informant states that she received information about the death of his brother.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 29.2.2024 (Annexure-1) passed in Cr. Misc. no. 62814 of 2023 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48626 of 2024(2) dt.18-07-2024 2/2 prayer for bail after framing of charge. Referring to the order dated 17.5.2024 contained in Annexure-3, it is submitted that charge has been framed against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 15.2.2023 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation, liberty granted to the petitioner by the aforesaid order of rejection dated 29.2.2024, charge having been framed in the case together with the petitioner having remained in custody since 15.2.2023, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sessions Trial no. 217 of 2024 (arising out of Purnea Sadar P.S Case no. 340 of 2021) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Purnea.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T